Call me Newbuck

I finished reading Moby Dick several weeks ago and highly recommend it to anyone who is looking for a good read. Prior to dipping into it, I had the impression that the book was dour, serious, and long. Those characterizations are true… but it is also hilarious in parts, peopled with wild and entertaining characters, and is a deep and thoughtful meditation on human nature and our world.

A short background and summary:

Herman "that's a nice beard" Melville


Herman Melville published Moby Dick in 1851, after he had given up his work as a merchant-seaman and whaler. Melville based the novel on his own experiences on the sea as well as the actual sinking of the whaleship Essex after being struck by a whale in 1820.

Moby Dick is narrated by the merchant-seaman Ishmael who joins the crew of the whaling-ship Pequod during the height of the American whale-fishery in the first half of the 19th century. As the novel progresses, Ishmael’s participation in the novel gradually deteriorates until he practically disappears from the narrative. Ahab, the captain of the Pequod, is obsessed with killing the albino whale Moby Dick who took his leg on a previous whaling voyage. As Ishmael disappears from the novel, Ahab grows in significance until he occupies almost the whole plot of the book.

The Pequod sails from Nantucket in pursuit of Sperm Whales in the Atlantic, Indian, and Pacific Oceans. At the time, whaling was an extremely lucrative business because spermacetti oil was the preferred source for candles due to its smokeless, bright flame. A successful voyage might harpoon several hundred whales over the course of a two- or three-year voyage; the accumulated oil from these whales could easily provide the entire crew with small fortunes at the conclusion of their journey. That is… if they survived that long: whaling was a notoriously dangerous profession; in addition to the hazards associated with sailing a large, wooden, square-rigged ship through the roughest waters in the world, the crew were expected to pursue 40-ton whales in small, wooden rowboats, harpoon said whales, and then be dragged at breakneck speed by the harpooned whales until they tired. As you would expect, many, many men died while whaling.

Will you be my friend?

The novel follows the whaling ship and crew as they travel around the Horn of Africa, into the Indian Ocean, through the Strait of Malacca, and finally into the Pacific in pursuit of the white whale. Along the way, Melville indulges in numerous detours as he describes the numerous intricacies and oddities of the whales and whaling. Melville uses these details of the profession as the framework onto which he adds sidelong analyses and critiques of the world as he sees it. These additions to the narrative can be distracting but they add a light, whimsical touch to a story that can be overly dark.

As the journey progresses, Ahab draws the crew further and further into his obsessive desire for revenge until only the first mate Starbuck retains any sense of the insanity of their mission. Just before catching up to Moby Dick, Starbuck reminds Ahab of his family in Nantucket in the hope that by doing so, he will convince the captain to turn the ship toward home. Ahab teeters on the brink of giving up the chase, but cannot turn away from his desire for revenge. The crew engages in a three-day chase that ends when the white whale rams the ship, sending the Pequod and her crew to the bottom of the Pacific. Ishmael alone is left to tell the tale of the ship and the whale.  

I've made a huge mistake...

Analysis of the Themes of Moby Dick:

The central theme of Moby Dick as I see it is the problem of living in a world which we know to be disordered and fallen. Captain Ahab has experienced tragedy in his life, a fact symbolized by the loss of his leg; he responds by seeking to restore justice to the scales of his life by killing the creature that unbalanced them. This desire to correct our world can be noble, and Ahab does present as such on occasion, but it can also be taken to the extreme. This excessive, utopian desire to perfect our fallen world is a feature of what is often called Romanticism and is very apparent in the poetry of the second wave of Romantics: Lord Byron, Shelley, and Keats. These poets were called in their own day the Satanic School because of the close thematic connections between their poetry and the character of Satan in Milton’s Paradise Lost. Milton depicts Satan as an individual knowingly struggling without hope against an impossibly strong God: “Better to reign in hell, then serve in Heav’n.”[1] In the case of the romantic poets, this struggle was seen as a fight against society, culture, the status quo, even reality itself.

Satan being dramatic


The ethos of the romantic poets has also been the driving force behind all revolutions (except perhaps the American) and all progressive movements since the French Revolution in 1789. However, the romantic ethos is altered slightly in progressivism from a noble but impossible struggle against reality into a belief that our broken, sordid world can be remade into paradise. The progressive sees the inequality and the injustice of our world and believes that those faults can be corrected. The danger of this philosophy becomes apparent when it meets any kind of opposition. Because the progressive believes that our world can be perfected, anyone who opposes the progressive agenda stands in the way of paradise on earth. Thus, the opponent of the progressive agenda becomes a traitor to humanity and is no longer a member of the in-group. Any cruelty becomes permissible when dealing with such an individual… ergo the great tragedies of the 20th century: the forced collectivization and the purges of the Soviet Union, the cultural revolution in China, the killing fields in Cambodia.

In contrast to the progressive impulse, the conservative believes that there are some features of human beings and our world which will never be perfected in this life. Because the conservative believes that some things are permanent, he also believes that the past can teach us about those permanent things. By looking to the past, we can make slow and steady progress as we work towards a better world for our descendants, but the injustice and the tragedy of our world will always be present to some degree. There are two alternative beliefs that the conservative can choose when faced with the injustice of our world: either suffering is meaningless, or it will be remedied in a better world to come. Those two alternatives: nihilism and hope, are opposite sides of the conservative coin; but, ironically, the nihilist often ends up in the same camp as the progressive.[2]


I "mustache" you a question


Captain Ahab is the personification of the romantic spirit: he desperately desires to correct the injustice of the world and he does not care whether he and the crew are destroyed in the process. Starbuck is the only member of the crew who opposes Ahab’s project, but he fails to act in time to save the crew. Our world, like the Pequod, needs men and women who are willing to oppose the self-destructive tendencies of our age; men and women who can successfully remind our world of the permanent things.



[1] Milton, Paradise Lost, book 1, line 263.

[2] Michael Polanyi explains this process in his chapter on Conviviality in Personal Knowledge. Our moral passions seek expression, even when an individual does not credit them with existence. The nihilist believes that the moral passions are products of our evolutionary history and do not convey real meaning, but nevertheless, feels the desire to express those passions in some way. A belief in scientific “necessity” allows the nihilist to express his moral passions, but in a way which is removed from any system of morality: this is what Polanyi calls “moral inversion.” (Michael Polanyi, Personal Knowledge (Chicago: Univerisity of Chicago Press, 1962), 232.)


Comments